Ethical Bioengineering
Ethical Bioengineering
This week’s material has changed my perspective on certain ethical considerations in biology. After learning about bioengineering projects and their artistic implications, I began to question how invasive these experiments can become and remain ethical.
Many bio-artists have tested this consideration and have different perspectives on what is considered life, what is considered property, and what experiments are considered art. “These artistic efforts include the identification of basic components of life and reproduction, exploration of entities that straddle boundaries, and the consideration whether animals or body parts, such as genes, should count as property” (Levy 2)’
Eduardo Kac, a famous bio-artist whose work involves genetically engineered organisms, performed alongside geneticists to create a “glowing” species. By inserting fluorescent genes into different organisms, causing them to have an internal luminescence, he inspired other bioengineers and bio-artists to experiment with this concept.
“Alba”, a genetically engineered rabbit, had this fluorescent gene inserted alongside “GloFish”, a black and white zebra fish. The “GloFish” became commercialized and was later reproduced for sale as a “pet”. This situation sparked an ethical conversation among artists and bioengineers. Is the “GloFish” considered a scientific experiment, or an artistic piece? Can life be considered art?
“As suggested by the similarity between Kac’s GFP projects and the commercial GloFish, the boundary between a work of art and a genetically engineered invention can be ambiguous.” (Levy 9) While some bio-artists hold the perspective that creation of life forms can be property and a form of performance art, others argue that manipulating living organisms can lead to the harm and exploitation of organisms who are valued less culturally.
Bioengineering artists have sparked the ongoing conversation of whether artistic expression can be synonymous with scientific experimentation.
SOURCES
Vesna, V. “5 bioart pt1.” Bruinlearn. 7 May 2024, https://bruinlearn.ucla.edu/courses/183769/pages/unit-6-view?module_item_id=6671250. Accessed 7 May 2024.
Vesna, V. “5 bioart pt2.” Bruinlearn. 7 May 2024, https://bruinlearn.ucla.edu/courses/183769/pages/unit-6-view?module_item_id=6671250. Accessed 7 May 2024.
Vesna, V. “5 bioart pt3.” Bruinlearn. 7 May 2024, https://bruinlearn.ucla.edu/courses/183769/pages/unit-6-view?module_item_id=6671250. Accessed 7 May 2024.
Levy, Ellen K. “Defining life:” Context Providers, 27 May 2014, pp. 275–298, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36xvqqx.16. Accesssed 7 May. 2024.
Mitcham, Carl. “Ethics in Bioengineering.” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 9, no. 3, 1990, pp. 227–31. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25072029. Accessed 13 May 2024.
IMAGES
Russel, Quincy. Eduardo Kac. 15 Dec. 2014. SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY, MONA LISA PRODUCTION, https://www.sciencephoto.com/media/c0155195/view.
Kac, Eduardo. GFP Bunny . 2000. Https://Www.Ekac.Org/Gfpbunny.Html, KAC.
Skinner, Penny. Is It Cruel to Keep Glofish? June 2023. Https://Pethelpful.Com/Fish-Aquariums/Is-It-Cruel-to-Keep-Glofish, PetHelpful.
Hi Abygayle, thank you so much for your thoughtful response! I appreciate your discussion about ethics as it's a major issue when discussing the intersection between art, technology, and biology. As new technology continues to develop, it's crucial for ethics to be regularly updated and emphasized. In my opinion, biological engineering can be considered art if the artist follows ethical guidelines and doesn't commercialize it through methods like mass production. Overall, this was a very thoughtful read.
ReplyDelete